RSS

Category Archives: Policy

Crown seals on sparkling shiraz

In lieu of my upcoming review of the Seppelt Silverband Grampians Sparkling Shiraz, which was crown sealed, I had another thought bubble today.

Philip White writes about “Australia’s love affair with the screwcap“; the increasing dominance of the screwcap as the main form of bottle enclosure, as opposed to cork (n.b after many cork failures, I’m a fan of the screwcap in still wines). My thoughts naturally carried over the use of cork and crown seals in sparkling shiraz.

Sparkling shiraz is still largely sealed by cork, at least seemingly at a ratio of 4:1, despite how often the crown seal is used during production (note the Tuesner video; Tuesner also prefer crown for final packaging too).

Is this because the ‘pop’ of the cork is symbolic of sparkling wine’s festive spirit, and thus producers keep it for semiotic, rather then production, reasons?

Or is there a production argument? None other than Accolade (née Constellation) fizz guru Ed Carr defends the cork in this article inspired by a disappointing cork failure:

According to Ed, “Cork closure and maturation under cork has a positive organoleptic effect and gives the wine additional complexity and character, hence we now use sparkling corks made by the new technologies which have an exceptionally low failure rate.A crown seal is an inert closure and as such the incidence of cork taint will be avoided, but conversely the wine will not develop the attractive characteristics of cork age.  In tasting trials comparing cork and crown closures we have always found the former to be ranked significantly higher.”

 When I asked for an elaboration on the “new technologies” here is the (short version) of the answer.  

1. Reduction of initial contamination of the raw cork;

2. Improved boiling techniques, eg smaller batch sizes

3. Washing and /or steam distillation of sparkling cork granulate and discs

4. Introduction of strict QA programs using GC/MS to analyse for TCA at all stages of production.”

 These technologies are not used by all cork suppliers and they usually come at an extra cost. Hardy’s carefully selects its suppliers based on continued performance and quality.”

The full text of Ric’s article is worth a read as a discussion point, though I’m not necessarily advocating all his commentary.

I do however suspect that crown seals will become the main choice of producers over the coming years, but I see this as much as a course of inevitability, as one led by taint / leakage / taste (either for/against) arguments.

Any thoughts?

UPDATE: 1 point to inevitability…

UPDATE 2: I was saving this link for a links-only post, but it’s related to this discussion. Check out Zorks over at Chris Plummer’s Australian Wine Journal.

See also: T’was a Black DayRutherglen embraces crowns | CSU Winery |

 
1 Comment

Posted by on November 11, 2011 in Distraction, Policy

 

Links!

Links, or, Why The Internet Is Awesome

Sparkling Shiraz

The Weekly Review has a neat article about Sparkling Shiraz

The Age includes sparkling shiraz by Seppelt and Grampians Estate in a guide to sparkling wines

But if you’re on a budget, maybe you can use a Soda Stream to make your own sparkling shiraz! (Wine without BS)

The Heston’s Feasts clip WwBS were channelling (YouTube) *well worth watching*

Policy (namely, the Wine Equalisation Tax)

Philip White’s delivery at the launch of the report Alcohol Taxation Reform – Starting With The Wine Equalisation Tax (also: pdf of The Alcohol Education and Rehabilitation Foundation submission to the recent Tax Forum, h/t Philip White)

Philip White again on why the WET is doomed

Peter Martin asks policy-makers to tax wine like beer (I agree with him)

Cameron Murray’s look at WET and comparison to microbreweries

Kym Anderson’s working paper on alcohol taxation (PDF), via Wine Economics and Reserach Centre, University of Adelaide (drawns upon research by Anderson, John Freebairn [both from University of Adelaide], and Preety Srivastava & Xueyan Zhao [of Monash University]) (h/t Stuart Mounter).

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on October 19, 2011 in Distraction, Policy